Compliance
How UmamiMind aligns security, privacy, and AI governance controls with enterprise and public-sector expectations—without overstating certification status.
Compliance posture
UmamiMind is built for auditability: every agent run is attributable, governed, and exportable. We describe control intent and evidence paths; we do not claim external certification unless specifically contracted and independently verified.
- Shared responsibility: customer configuration and data classification drive final compliance outcomes.
- Risk-based: higher risk actions and data flows receive stronger oversight and tighter constraints.
- Evidence-first: policies, procedures, and run telemetry are structured for review and export.
Control domains
Framework alignment (mapping, not certification)
- ISO/IEC 27001 themes (ISMS control families and evidence expectations)
- SOC 2 (Security, Availability) control intent and audit readiness structure
- NIST 800-53 family mapping for public-sector procurement review
- NIST AI RMF concepts for AI governance and model risk management
AI governance
Agentic systems create unique risk. UmamiMind enforces governance through policy-bound orchestration, tool allowlists, budget caps, and end-to-end traceability from prompt to tool call to outcome.
Security questionnaires
We support vendor questionnaires and security reviews during pilots. Typical inputs include a control narrative, architecture overview, data flow summary, and incident response process description. Use the Trust Center exports to accelerate completion.
What we do not claim
Unless explicitly contracted and independently verified, UmamiMind does not claim SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 certification, FedRAMP authorization, or other external attestations. We provide alignment statements and evidence pathways to support your due diligence.